<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>crazed &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crazed.org.uk/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk</link>
	<description>Musings of a web developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:14:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So you need to transfer almost a GB of files&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2011/10/so-you-need-to-transfer-almost-a-gb-of-files/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2011/10/so-you-need-to-transfer-almost-a-gb-of-files/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rsync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and the source server is too slow to tar -z all these files without having the tar process killed (and the thought of waiting several hours to trickle 50,000 files down the pipe is too much)&#8230; rsync is your friend! With compression, efficiency, and resume-able, it took only several minutes to shrink-send 700MB. Background: a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the source server is too slow to tar -z all these files without having the tar process killed (and the thought of waiting several hours to trickle 50,000 files down the pipe is too much)&#8230;</p>
<p>rsync is your friend!</p>
<p>With compression, efficiency, and resume-able, it took only several minutes to shrink-send 700MB.</p>
<p>Background: a website running on a dual-core Atom server all the way over in the US needs to be migrated over to a faster host elsewhere. My several attempts at compressing the files with tar -zcf failed with &#8216;Process killed&#8217;  &#8211; presumably too much processing time was being allocated to this one task. Rsync, as well as being a synchronising superstar, is fantastic at transferring large number of files. I also use rsync to pull manual updates over to live sites (leaving bazaar for the test site).</p>
<p>Caveat: both sides need access to the rsync command with SSH access (or a running rsync daemon). The more files needed, the more free RAM needed &#8211; approximately 100MB for every million files <img src='http://www.crazed.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2011/10/so-you-need-to-transfer-almost-a-gb-of-files/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Wave meets Pulp Fiction</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/10/google-wave-meets-pulp-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/10/google-wave-meets-pulp-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="304" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xcxF9oz9Cu0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="304" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xcxF9oz9Cu0&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/10/google-wave-meets-pulp-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/07/home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/07/home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Home is never far from our thoughts, though. How many times have you looked forward for months to a holiday, only to find that on day three you’re already dreaming of your own bed? But when you return, the process starts all over again.&#8221; Mark Mason in The Times, July 20th]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Home is never far from our thoughts, though.  How many times have you looked forward for months to a holiday, only to find  that on day three you’re already dreaming of your own bed? But when you  return, the process starts all over again.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6719667.ece">Mark Mason</a> in The Times, July 20th</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/07/home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenge is bad mkay?</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/03/revenge-is-bad-mkay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/03/revenge-is-bad-mkay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;According to the German national socio-economic database, vengeful people are more likely to be unemployed, have fewer friends and are less satisfied with their lives than those who occasionally let a bad turn go unpunished.&#8221; http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/27/german_revenge_inefficient/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;According to the German national socio-economic database, vengeful people are more likely to be unemployed, have fewer friends and are less satisfied with their lives than those who occasionally let a bad turn go unpunished.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/27/german_revenge_inefficient/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/27/german_revenge_inefficient/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/03/revenge-is-bad-mkay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook killed TV</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/03/facebook-killed-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/03/facebook-killed-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;After decades of running an IV drip right into their audience, people in the entertainment business had understandably come to think of them as rather passive. They thought they&#8217;d be able to dictate the way shows reached audiences. But they underestimated the force of their desire to connect with one another.&#8221; Why TV lost: http://www.paulgraham.com/convergence.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;After decades of running an IV drip right into their audience, people in the entertainment business had understandably come to think of them as rather passive.  They thought they&#8217;d be able to dictate the way shows reached audiences.  But they underestimated the force of their desire to connect with one another.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Why TV lost: <a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/convergence.html" target="_blank">http://www.paulgraham.com/convergence.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2009/03/facebook-killed-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 minutes with the Blackberry Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/5-minutes-with-the-blackberry-storm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/5-minutes-with-the-blackberry-storm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry storm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vodafone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve not been living under a rock lately, you should have noticed all those Blackberry Storm adverts that Vodafone is pushing lately, with over £1 million spent on promotion! Anyway, I had a chance to have a quick play with the device at some random Vodafone store which was lucky enough to have one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve not been living under a rock lately, you should have noticed all those Blackberry Storm adverts that Vodafone is pushing lately, with over £1 million spent on promotion!</p>
<p>Anyway, I had a chance to have a quick play with the device at some random Vodafone store which was lucky enough to have one to demo with.</p>
<p><strong>First impressions</strong>: very lovely looking device. 430&#215;360 screen, bright, good definition.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crazed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/bbstorm-closeup.jpg" rel="lightbox[109]"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-112" title="Blackberry Storm closeup" src="http://www.crazed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/bbstorm-closeup-500x186.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="186" /></a></p>
<p>Now, the main thing that everyone has been raving on about is the touchscreen, as this is a major departure for RIM who is known for their emphasis on messaging and physical QWERTY-based keypad phones. How does it play with just the screen alone?</p>
<p>The spring-mounted clicky screen (known in RIM&#8217;s marketing speak as <strong>SurePress</strong>) sounded very interesting when I first heard about it &#8211; it solves the issue of touchscreens lacking proper feedback, ignoring all that haptic feedback stuff. Press down, and the screen goes down, and clicks. Like a big button. Being capacitive, it is pretty sensitive to your fingertouch, but you cannot use styluses (or any other object) on this.</p>
<p><strong>SurePress: </strong>I had my doubts before I demoed this &#8211; what happens when you want to use more than one fingers (like two thumbs) to type, like you would do on a normal physical keypad? Would you have to depress the screen before you can &#8216;type&#8217; another letter (as Engadget thought), or does the Storm have some other trick up its metaphysical sleeve? </p>
<p>I found the touch feedback great for menus, navigation, general usage and dialling. Typing an email/note/whatever was more awkward, but it does still allow you to type reasonably quickly, given time to practise &#8211; when you press down to type a letter, the screen goes down, but you can still enter other letters without having to depress the screen. So it is still quite usable if you like your touchscreens.</p>
<p>I still find I make too many odd niggly mistakes when finger typing on touchscreen keyboards however, and the lack of error correction and letter feedback doesn&#8217;t help (it is hard to see which letter you are pressing at times). Personally, I would prefer a proper keypad, but you might like using the screen far more than me!</p>
<p><strong>The rest of the phone</strong> &#8211; all quite standard &#8211; it does audio and video playback, various messenging apps, web browsing (still slow though), phone stuff!</p>
<p>There is one gripe though: the adverts mention &#8216;Designed for Vodafone&#8217; (or Verizon) &#8211; so the phone comes with 3G, but no WiFi connectivity &#8211; guess who dictated this! If the Bold can do it, why not the Storm? Quite a poor move on Vodafone&#8217;s part, as all the other major smartphones come with WiFi as standard &#8211; very useful when there is no 3G connection available. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, it is very well built, and it spices up the choices available, but the OS does feel slow at times, and not entirely polished.</p>
<p><strong>My conclusion</strong>? Nice to look at, nice to feel, not so great for me to use. The Vodafone rep I was speaking to made a good point: Bold for keyboard lovers, Storm for the media mad. (She loves her Samsung Omnia to bits, so she could claim to be relatively unbiased on the Blackberrys).</p>
<p>Anyway read this for a more in-depth review: <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/11/20/verizon-blackberry-storm-review/">http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/11/20/verizon-blackberry-storm-review/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/5-minutes-with-the-blackberry-storm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail themes</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/gmail-themes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/gmail-themes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, theming without needing greasemonkey hacks! I can finally inject some personality into the app. If you&#8217;re a Google Mail user and still haven&#8217;t noticed the changes - http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/?utm_source=us-en-gmnav&#38;utm_medium=et&#38;utm_content=gmnav]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, theming without needing greasemonkey hacks! I can finally inject some personality into the app. If you&#8217;re a Google Mail user and still haven&#8217;t noticed the changes - <a href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/?utm_source=us-en-gmnav&amp;utm_medium=et&amp;utm_content=gmnav">http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/?utm_source=us-en-gmnav&amp;utm_medium=et&amp;utm_content=gmnav</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/gmail-themes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trick or Treat season 2</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/trick-or-treat-season-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/trick-or-treat-season-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derren brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to admit, I&#8217;m a big fan of Derren Brown&#8217;s productions with his provocative insights into the human psyche. His Trick or Treat series is no exception &#8211; I somehow managed to miss season 2 on TV, so I am quite fortunate to find some decent quality streams on Vimeo. I&#8217;m missing 4 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, I&#8217;m a big fan of Derren Brown&#8217;s productions with his provocative insights into the human psyche. His Trick or Treat series is no exception &#8211; I somehow managed to miss season 2 on TV, so I am quite fortunate to find some decent quality streams on Vimeo. I&#8217;m missing 4 and 5, but it saves on those bittorrent downloads! I&#8217;m definitely up for going to one of the stage shows when they next pop up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1129084" target="_blank">Episode 1</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1129311" target="_blank">Episode 2</a> - Negative Thinking</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1135036" target="_blank">Episode 3</a> &#8211; Time</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1156712" target="_blank">Episode 6</a> &#8211; Superstition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/11/trick-or-treat-season-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epic FAIL</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/10/epic-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/10/epic-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why FAIL, instead of failure, or failed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2202262/pagenum/all/" target="_blank">FAIL</a>, instead of failure, or failed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/10/epic-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfortunately named domains</title>
		<link>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/10/unfortunately-named-domains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/10/unfortunately-named-domains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crazed.org.uk/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How&#8217;s this for rather unfortunate domain names: Welsh IT &#8211; www.welshit.co.uk Speed of Art &#8211; www.speedofart.com Morrison &#38; Foerster &#8211; mofo.com (sounds like a good law firm to work in, more of a selling point to me!) Therapist Finder &#8211; www.therapistfinder.com (is this therapy?) Auctions Hit &#8211; www.auctionshit.com (Ebay competitor, lack of confidence there)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s this for rather unfortunate domain names:</p>
<ul>
<li>Welsh IT &#8211; www.welshit.co.uk</li>
<li>Speed of Art &#8211; www.speedofart.com</li>
<li>Morrison &amp; Foerster &#8211; mofo.com (sounds like a good law firm to work in, more of a selling point to me!)</li>
<li>Therapist Finder &#8211; www.therapistfinder.com (is this therapy?)</li>
<li>Auctions Hit &#8211; www.auctionshit.com (Ebay competitor, lack of confidence there)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crazed.org.uk/2008/10/unfortunately-named-domains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

